Vincent Luizzi; LEGAL REASONING AND LEGAL THEORY. By Neil MacCormick. Oxford: Clarendon Press. , The American Journal of. Since its first appearance in , this work has established itself as a classic of legal philosophy. This study focuses on current jurisprudential. Citation Information. Kloepfer, Stephen. “Book Review: Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, by Neil MacCormick.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal ().
|Country:||Turks & Caicos Islands|
|Published (Last):||19 January 2016|
|PDF File Size:||14.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.86 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Index of statutes cited. Open to the public Book English University of Adelaide.
Public Private login e. Open to the public ; Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory.
Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: These 30 locations in All: Supreme Court of Queensland. Classical, Early, and Medieval Plays and Playwrights: Oxford University Press is a department of reasoing University of Oxford. Open to the public ; K What makes an argument in a law case good or bad?
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory
The Argument From Injustice: These online bookshops told us they have this item: Customers who bought this item also bought. Not available for loan Book English Show 0 more libraries Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov – – Ratio Juris 24 3: A Defence of the Original View.
Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1.
Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources. This entry has no external links.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory – Oxford Scholarship
Clarendon Press ; New York: Sign in to use this feature. Get to Know Us. The University of Melbourne Library. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Neil MacCormick A Clarendon Press Publication Clarendon Law Series Since its first appearance inthis work has established itself as a classic of legal philosophy Now available in paperback, and with a new foreword by the author, this popular book will continue to be of use to students and teachers of law, legal theory, and philosophy.
Clear Cases and Hard Cases. Amalia Amaya – – Ratio Juris 24 3: It contains an accurate description of how judges decide the “hard cases”, that is, those who could not be decided with the logic and techniques of formalism or legalism.
Fuller on Political Obligation. Can legal decisions be justified by purely rational argument or are they ultimately determined by more subjective influences?
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Law Reasoning Summary “What makes an argument in a law case good or bad? There’s a problem loading this menu right now.