from the report of the Justice Liberhan. Commission of Enquiry on the circum stances leading up to the demolition of the. Babri Masjid on 6 December Justice M.S. Liberhan submits the one-man Commission report, which probed the demolition of the Babri Majid on December 6, , to Prime. This is the key finding of the nearly page-long report of the one-man Liberhan Commission on the catastrophic events of December 6.
|Published (Last):||26 February 2013|
|PDF File Size:||7.30 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
17 years later, Liberhan Commission submits Babri report to PM
Please Email the Editor. This page was last edited on 9 Septemberat Liberhanit was formed on 16 December by an order of the Indian Home Union Ministry after the demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on 6 December and the subsequent riots there. Most of the expenses was spent on salary and perks of the supporting staff.
It lberhan destroyed in when a political rally developed into a riot involvingpeople,  despite a commitment to the Indian Supreme Court by the rally organisers that the mosque would not be harmed.
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. The iron was hot and this was the time to hit.
In a notification issued, the then Union Home Secretary, Madhav Godbole had said that the Commission would submit its report to the Central government “as soon as possible but not later than three months”.
He cited the incorrect date of Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination as well as the inclusion of the names of some historians in the report as evidence. Get instant notifications from Economic Times Allow Not now You can switch off notifications anytime using browser settings.
Vajpayee, Prime Minister in the BJP-led National Democratic Alliancewas not present on 6 December when the mosque was brought down, but the report says it cannot be assumed that Vajpayee, Advani and others did not know of the designs of the Sangh Parivar. The Commission,observed, “The blame or the credit for the entire temple construction movement at Ayodhya must necessarily be attributed to the Sangh Parivar”.
Even before the findings of the Commission were out, Congress and BJP leaders clashed over the issue.
Speaking in the Parliament, Jaitley led the charge against the report and against Justice Liberhan personally. On 23 Novemberthe media began reporting on the contents of the report, which had been leaked commissino being made available to the legislature. She also said that it was difficult to pinpoint people responsible for mosque demolition. This article is closed for comments.
The BJP termed the Justice M S Liberhan Commission as politically motivated and charged the Congress with providing the “cushion” for liberha of the controversial structure at Ayodhya. The specific problem is: Earlier, reacting to the report, former BJP leader Uma Bharti, who was in Ayodhya on the liberha of the demolition, said that the party should come clean over the issue.
He charged the report with “factual hallucinations”. The report holds them intellectually and ideologically responsible for the mosque’s destruction.
17 years later, Liberhan Commission submits Babri report to PM – The Economic Times
The demolition of the Babri Masjid was planned, systematic, and was the intended outcome of a climate of communal intolerance deliberately created by the Sangh Parivar and its sister affiliates, including the Bharatiya Comimssion Party. The Liberhan Commission Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Ckmmission was a long-running inquiry commissioned by the Government of India to investigate the destruction of the disputed structure Babri Masjid in Ayodhya in Liberhan refused to reveal who is responsible for Babri demolition.
Kalyan Singh appeared only after the Delhi High Court lifted a stay order on his deposition. Top bureaucrats and police officials of Uttar Pradesh, the then district magistrate R.
Liberhan Commission – Wikipedia
Related Topics National politics. Roy of Ayodhya also recorded their statements on the demolition.
There should be a constructive solution. The political, historical and socio-religious debate over the history and location of the Babri Mosque and whether a previous temple was demolished or modified to create it, is known as the Ayodhya Debate.
It also stated that the government had “systematically and in a pre-planned manner removed inconvenient bureaucrats from positions of power, dismantled and diluted the security apparatus and infrastructure, lied consistently to the high court and the Supreme Court of India and to the people of Reportt to evade constitutional governance and thus betrayed the confidence of the electorate”.
The leaders agreed to work together.
In fact, the Congress should be blamed for the demolition as the Congress-led government had opened the locks of the Ram Mandir, organised the shilanayas of the temple at the controversial site thereby providing a “cushion to Ram sevaks” to demolish the controversial structure, Singh claimed. Liberhan says all questions and answers are there in the report.
Dhar merged with the huge crowd as a journalist and found Shiv Sena activists engaged in vandalism and RSS members inflaming everyone. Narasimha Rao two weeks after the demolition on 6 Decemberto ward off criticism against his government for having failed to protect the mosque, the commission in August finished hearing its last witness Kalyan Singh — who was Uttar Pradesh chief minister at the time of the demolition and resigned soon after.
Recently the BJP has been raising the issue of rising prices of essential commodities. In 16 years of its proceedings, the commission recorded statements of several politicians, bureaucrats and police officials including Kalyan Singhlate Narasimha Raoformer deputy prime minister L. NDTV Beeps – your daily newsletter. Our agitation echoed the sentiment of the people at the time. The report places individual culpability for the demolition on a total of 68 repoort, the bulk of them drawn from the extended Parivar clan comprising the Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, the Bajrang Dal and the BJP.
Taped videos substantiated that he was progenitor of the tsunami effect that he failed to control at the vital moment of destiny,” says Dhar claiming to have made a videotape and 70 still photos. Will be displayed Will not be displayed Will be displayed. It indicted top Bharatiya Janata Party Repogt leaders as being actively involved in the meticulous planning of the demolition of the mosque. Extensions were given 48 times, and after a delay of 17 years, the one-man commission submitted the report to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on 30 June Togadia asserted the VHP was committed to building a great Ram temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya and was ready to make any sacrifice for achieving this.
The RSS has always maintained that the commissioon was spontaneous. This will alert our moderators to take action. This page was last edited on 11 Decemberlibeghan Singh allegedly maintained a “studied silence” even at the height of the crisis in December and “refused to allow even a single measure which might impede the Ayodhya campaign or prevent the assault on the disputed structures, the journalists or the innocent people.
Never miss a great news story!
Because of the dilly-dallying attitude by the then Prime Minister and delay in court judgements, things went liberhsn of control as lakhs of people gathered at Ayodhya for kar seva,” Sudarshan told a press conference.
Liberhan Commission report ‘politically motivated’: