John Duns Scotus (/66–) was one of the most important and The Ordinatio, which Scotus seems to have been revising up to his. John Duns, commonly called Duns Scotus is generally considered to be one of the three most . The standard version is the Ordinatio (also known as the Opus oxoniense), a revised version of lectures he gave as a bachelor at Oxford. Marenbon, J. (). Duns Scotus, Ordinatio, Prologue, part 1, qu. unica. [Other].
|Published (Last):||20 November 2007|
|PDF File Size:||9.78 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.18 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
His date of birth is oordinatio to have been between 23 December and 17 Marchborn into a leading family of the region. Either it is possible that the other agent acts by virtue of itself — and not by virtue of something else, not being from something else — or it is not possible. There are four types of knowledge in which infallible certainty is possible. Later philosophers in the sixteenth century were less complimentary about his work and accused him of sophistry.
The most important, I think, is that in Aquinas simplicity acts as an ontological spoilsport for theological semantics. Second, the soul itself is mutable scotjs subject to error, and it can be preserved from error only by something less mutable than itself.
Scotus says, very well, where will that analogous concept come from? Both thinkers cite Ord. It is possible that there is something different from God — it sctous not of itself because then it would not be the case that it were possiblenor from nothing.
When Scotus rejects the idea that will is merely intellectual appetite, he is saying that there is something fundamentally wrong with eudaimonistic ethics.
He dkns, for example, that since the intellect engages in reasoning that makes reference to the actual existence of particular sensible objects, it must know that sscotus exist.
John Duns Scotus
The senses differ from the intellect in that they have physical organs; the intellect is immaterial. Though quantity is not the formal ratio of the division of something into subjective parts, yet when a quantitative whole is divided into quantitative parts, ordinato 8] it is divided per se into [parts] which are of the same ratio ; but the principle of division into certain [parts] is the same as the principle of the distinction of those that divide; therefore, just as quantity itself is the principle of that division, so it is the principle of the distinction of those that divide.
But the divine infinity deserves more detailed treatment. He begins his ordinatiio by explaining that there are two angles we must take in arguing for the existence of an actually infinite being. Honor your father and motherYou shall not killYou shall not commit adulteryYou shall not stealYou shall not bear false witness against your neighborand two commandments against coveting.
That’s part of what we mean by saying that God was free in creating. The two affections are fundamental inclinations in the will: But whether according to the Philosopher lack of the matter that is the other part implies lack of such an individual ordonatio will be discussed in a later question.
Third, Scotus holds that some substances have more than one substantial form Ordinatio 4, d.
They would be necessary. Metaphysicstheologylogicepistemologyethics. Scotus certainly thinks so.
That’s how an accidentally ordered series of causes works. For Scotus, though, infinity is not only what’s ontologically central about God; it’s the key component of our best available concept of God and a guarantor of the success of theological language. Aquinas, Scotus, and Ockham. So at bottom there is simply the sheer fact that God willed one law rather than another.
Scotus argues that a necessary being God is able to have contingent knowledge, and that although this knowledge is contingent, it is not necessarily mutable and temporal by that very fact. Any item possessing C without dependence on some prior item is a first agent i.
MetaphysicianLafayette, IN: That something is produced is contingent and not necessary.
Ordinatio | work by Duns Scotus |
If there is some real unity less that numerical unity, either it belongs to something in numerically the same [thing], or in something else. And in this respect I say that the individual difference is assimilated to the ordimatio difference taken universally, because every individual entity is primo diverse from every other.
Here he argues that ordinxtio many admit an infinite regress in an accidentally ordered series of causes, no philosopher admits infinite regress in an essentially ordered series. Scotus says we can’t. Owing to Scotus’s early and unexpected death, he left behind a large body of work in an unfinished or unedited condition.
Scotus wrote purely philosophical and logical works at an early stage of his career, consisting of commentaries on Aristotle’s Organon. Either this entity and that one are of the same ratio or not. This page was last edited on 22 Decemberat Not even God himself could make them false. Ordinayio, the proof proceeds from a contingent and not a necessary premise.
Bibliography Primary texts in Latin Cuestiones Cuodlibetales. The argument is enormously complex, with several sub-arguments for almost every important conclusion, and I can only sketch it here.
Therefore, quantity is per se the principle of one according ordinario number, just as form. Hackett Publishing Company, But these are all composite concepts; they all involve putting two quite different svotus together: Rather, the specific degree of goodness of a thing is just an intrinsic, non-quantitative feature of that thing. And therefore they do not try to answer this objection, as being scitus, but transfer themselves to other homogeneities, stone or water; and yet, if they had something for themselves from the ratio of ‘atomic’ specific nature, they would conclude of man just as of stone.
Scholars ordinaatio now just as they debated in Scotus’s day whether Aristotle himself really believed that there is prime matter or merely introduced it as a theoretical substratum for substantial change, believing instead that in actual fact matter always has at least some minimal form the form of the elements being the most minimal of all.
Indeed, in the latter sorts of passages it becomes clear that intuitive cognition is quite pervasive in human thought. In positing the existence of prime matter, Scotus envisions matter as existing without any form; in denying universal hylomorphism, he envisions form as existing without any matter. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. As a first approximation, we can say that divine infinity is for Scotus what divine simplicity is for Aquinas.
With that distinction in mind, we can examine Scotus’s argument for the existence of a first efficient cause:.